.

Tea Party Winners: Carla Gade's winner is Becky Dempsey, Andrea Boeshaar's winner Caryl Kane, Gina Welborn's winner Jasmine A., Carrie Fancett Pagels' winners book copy -- Lynda Edwards, teacup and saucer -- Wendy Shoults

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Literacy in Colonial America



“No country on the face of the earth can boast of a larger proportion of inhabitants, versed in the rudiments of science, or fewer, who are not able to read and write their names, than the United States of America.”
The Columbian Phenix and Boston Review, 1800

For the past four years I have been employed by an adult literacy organization in my community. According to ProLiteracy America an estimated 90 million adults have low functional literacy. This includes a person’s ability to read and write, use computers, do basic math, and skills to develop fundamental English as a new language. 30 million adults in America function at the lowest level of literacy, unable to accomplish those tasks, while an additional 60 million people function at only a slightly higher level.

It astonishes me that this day in age there are still so many adults with such low levels of literacy when at one time our country boasted of almost universal literacy. Yet contrasting the rate of literacy in the 21st century to that of the 18th century is difficult as measurements vary based on how literacy is defined, and is proportional to the population considered during these time periods.

In New England there was a population of 120,000 (1706), 250,000 (1734),500,000 (1762),1,000,000 (1790). Today the U. S. has a total population of over 310 million people.  But we must keep in mind that in colonial America only the Anglo population was considered in literacy estimates, excluding Indians, African Americans, slaves and indentured servants.In Virginia, an entire 40% of the population who were slaves were disregarded. Slaves were largely illiterate and prohibited from learning to read as a means of social control.

Historical records are incomplete so the information that has been studied on literacy in our country's past is estimated, but educational historians assert that New England in the late 18th century had the highest literacy rate in the world at the time, nearly 100% in Boston.  Literacy was higher in New England and the mid-Atlantic colonies than in the South. Literacy was also higher in cities than in more rural areas. In New England the literacy rate was 60% between 1650-1670, 85% between 1758- 1762, and 90% between 1787 - 1795. In Virginia it was between 54% & 60% in the late 18th century. Literacy in early New York and Pennsylvania was high, owing much to their Dutch and German immigrants. While the average literacy rate was about 70% it was higher than in England, although when taking into account the illiteracy among Indians and African Americans this would place literacy for the total population slightly lower than in England. Immigrants to the American colonies were also more literate than the general population of the countries they left, although Scotland and Wales also had high literacy levels. There were varying levels of literacy among New England women in the eighteenth century - between 45% - 67% during 1731-1800, though some estimates found female literacy to be 90% by the Revolutionary period.


There was a great emphasis on universal literacy in the early colonial era of the 17th century largely based on the puritan belief in the importance of Bible reading. To this end a 1642 New England law stated, "See that all youth under family government be taught to read perfectly in the English tongue..." By 1647 the Massachusetts General Court passed the "Old Deluder Act" calling for the establishment of grammar schools to thwart "one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men form knowledge of Scriptures." So while we may think of literacy in the most basic terms of having the ability to read and write the English language, literacy in the American Colonies held a primary importance on reading.

Students would master their horn book and then move on to the New England Primer. Boys learned to read, write, and do basic math, went on to become apprentices and perhaps obtain a higher education. Reading and writing were taught as separate skills and writing was not considered necessary for females, so she would learn more practical skills and reinforce her reading as well as embroidery skills by working on a sampler. Both the New England Primer and samplers incorporated moral themes into the text.



18th century New England Primer
18th century Sampler

The ability to read the printed word didn't necessarily result in the ability to read handwriting in any "hand" (writing style). And being able to write one's name or copy phrases did not mean one could compose. Colonists were often expected to put their name to deeds, parish registers, and baptismal records in early America. While some could write, others simply mastered writing their own name, but many signed these documents with their “mark”. Writing in colonial America was predominantly a male skill and tied strongly to class and occupations such as lawyers, clerks, scolars, physicians, clergy and businessmen. But women who could read, write, and do basic arithmetic were better prepared to run their households more efficiently and correspond with friends and family through letter writing. Later in the century women had more opportunity to expand their education.

Literacy has always had the potential to free individuals to be better educated, get better jobs, participate more in their communities, guide morals, and help the next generation to be more literate - both now and in colonial times.


Resources:

Writing the Past: Teaching Reading in Colonial America and the United States 1640-1940

The Instructor, or American Young Man's Best Companion Containing Spelling, Reading, Writing, and Arithmetick, George Fischer, 1786
Published by Isaiah Thomas, Worcester

Every Man Able to Read - Colonial Williamsburg

How to Read 18th Century British-American Writing

14 comments:

  1. Carla, I've always admired your literacy work. It's hard to imagine not being able to read or read well but it is a reality. Love the history behind the impetus to read throughout the ages, especially in colonial times. So interesting that those from Scotland and Wales were among the most well read! Thanks for another great post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad this was posted. Literacy is such a vital element in making freedom a reality. Thank you for this information and for what you have done to assist people with these skills!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you, Laura and Carrie, it's a privilege. As I learn more about literacy and about colonial America I realize the rich heritage we have that has contributed to making our great nation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very interesting! Some of my ancestors were Puritans from Boston and Plymouth Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. In some of the geneological material I read, they all could read and write. It seemed really important to them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cara, that is interesting to hear that you have seen that reflected in your genealogy research. Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh, and by the way, we may share some of the same ancestors!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Closer-placed communities of the Northeast seems more conducive to literacy, as trading written works would prove easier when people saw more of one another. In the South, where the population was more scattered and lower, also the mortality rate amongst the young was higher mainly due to climates, according to Morgan and some other sources, literacy became less of a priority. Poverty was higher and books more scarce. Then again, the first college was in Virginia--William and Mary. It can't lay claim to being the oldest now, because it has twice lost its charter due to wars.

    All in all, though, quite interesting.

    Once upon a time, I read how Ireland was the most literate nation in the sixteenth century. Ireland is neither a strong interest nor expertise of mine, so I can't recall the source, but that detail stuck for me, as it was a contrast to latter centuries in the same nation--post British invasion of the seventeenth century and later.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Note: Mohawk Chief Joseph Brant studied at Moor's School, forerunner to Dartmouth College. He also translated the Book of Mark into Mohawk.
    Carla, wondered what your thoughts are on the elimination of cursive writing in schools today?
    Blessings!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Getting tired,so forgive me--but also wanted to say this is a great post, Carla--Thank you!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. You bring up a good point, Laurie Alice. There have been many times when communities were simply in survival mode and people were not able to give as much attention to literacy. There have always been stumbling blocks, and still are, that prevent individuals from improving these skills, including economic factors as you said. Although there is still a high rate of illiteracy in America it is good that we have resources such as ProLiteracy that provides free tutoring to those in need. I've been happy to serve as one of them.

    Good note on Ireland, too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks, Pat! I'm glad you shared that about the Mohawk Chief Joseph Brant who became such an educated man and translator. I look up his story which is quite fascinating. http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/1998/brant.html

    Puritan pastor John Eliot translated the entire Bible into Algonquin which was America's first printing of the Bible. You can learn more about that here: http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/john-eliot.html

    The Bible was translated into their native tongue through the process of translating their phonetic tongue into character symbols of the alphabet.

    But it is interesting to note that evangelizing the Indians to Christianity was also a method of controlling them the same way that keeping them and black slaves illiterate with the English written word also was.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pat, you also asked about what I thought about the elimination of cursive writing from the school systems. What a poor decision to do so! I understand the need to adapt to technology and new methods of communication, but soon we will have generations unable to write cursive OR read cursive. Handwriting is and always has been an important skill, and this includes cursive. There will have to be special translators just for that! It will be a sad day when the keyboard totally replaces the pen. One of my article resources above discusses how 18th century folk had to learn various types of script for reading and writing and they were not literate in all hands. And it looks like this may be part of the evolution of handwriting, but at least computers still have cursive fonts! http://dohistory.org/on_your_own/toolkit/writing.html

    ReplyDelete
  13. Not only that, Carla, but many people with fine motor issues can write much more easily and quickly using script vs. cursive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Such a lively conversation on literacy in Colonial America. Thank you all for stopping by.

      Delete

Thanks for commenting, please check back for our replies!